Design thinking, part 2: Assessment

Creativity 101, Uncategorized, Understanding Creativity

Today in creativity class, we learned more about the scary part of creativity: assessment.

It’s well known that Vincent Van Gogh’s paintings weren’t successful until after his death. His society’s criteria apparently didn’t match up with criteria of future generations: Such is the plight of many artists and musicians, “ahead of their time.” But what determines whether something is too far ahead in time? What determines which creative works are valuable to society, and which creative works are garbage (and does garbage even exist)? In other words, how do we assess creativity?

One method is consensus: a group of experts decides, based on a set of criteria, what is the most creative. We tried this method in class today, coming to an agreement in groups on which logos, Apple products, paintings, and sneakers had the most creative designs. We selected criteria for each category, and it became clear just how subjective the process is. Each group selected mostly different criteria, showing how everyone had a different idea of what creativity is.

There has to be some sort of marker for what is valuable and what isn’t. Sure, something may be creative– but it also might not be valuable to everyone. For instance, if I made a painting of my toilet, it could be creatively done, but it wouldn’t be featured in a gallery and auctioned off at Sotheby’s because a badly drawn toilet doesn’t mean much to anyone. Unless, of course, I tried selling it in a parallel universe that loves paintings of toilets.

So in this way, an assessment of creativity depends on criteria, and the society framing the criteria. Perhaps a part of creativity lies in understanding the society in which you’re creating (or at least to be financially successful and creative).

One thought on “Design thinking, part 2: Assessment

  1. The issue of trying to make a living as an artist is one that has been debated for many years: Can one be true to oneself as an artist while also trying to appeal to a popular (or at least paying) audience? Some people would argue that if you’re trying to commercialize your art, you’re “selling out.” Of course, in some historical periods, artists of all kinds had patrons who supported them–so I suppose they had to please their patrons. “tis a puzzle.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s